The cryptocurrency market has seen dramatic shifts in recent months, with one trend standing out: Solana (SOL) has surged 300% against Ethereum (ETH) over the past year, while ETH/BTC has declined by 50% in the last two years. This raises a critical question for investors and builders alike — why is Ethereum, once the undisputed leader in smart contract platforms, struggling to keep pace?
Kyle Samani, managing partner and co-founder of Multicoin Capital — a major backer of Solana — offers a compelling analysis on the structural, economic, and experiential factors behind Ethereum’s underperformance. While not a direct attack on ETH, his insights highlight real challenges that could shape the next phase of blockchain evolution.
Market Gravity: The Inevitable Slowdown of Large Assets
As assets grow in size, their ability to sustain rapid growth diminishes — a phenomenon Kyle refers to as "market gravity." Ethereum’s current market cap sits around $300 billion, making it the 34th largest asset globally. In contrast, Bitcoin ranks 10th.
This scale brings higher expectations. Investors demand consistent innovation, scalability, and strong value capture — all of which become harder to deliver at such magnitude. The larger the ecosystem, the more complex coordination becomes, slowing down progress and dampening investor sentiment.
👉 Discover how leading blockchain platforms are tackling scalability and growth challenges.
Bitcoin, however, appears somewhat immune to this gravity due to its unique positioning. It's widely perceived as digital gold — a decentralized store of value with a fixed supply of 21 million coins. This clear narrative simplifies adoption and reduces scrutiny over technical limitations.
Ethereum lacks that simplicity. It’s expected to be everything: a settlement layer, a computation engine, a financial infrastructure, and a platform for global applications. That ambition creates uncertainty — and uncertainty weighs on price.
Value Capture: The Core Challenge for Ethereum
At the heart of Kyle’s critique is value capture — the mechanism by which a blockchain retains economic value from its activity.
For an asset worth $300 billion, having an unclear or inefficient value capture model is a serious concern. Ethereum’s base layer (Layer 1) struggles to capture value generated by Layer 2 networks and decentralized applications (dApps), many of which operate semi-independently.
Kyle argues that Layer 2s are parasitic on Layer 1 — they rely on Ethereum for security but extract most of the revenue and user engagement. With transaction costs trending toward zero and MEV (Maximal Extractable Value) increasingly captured off-chain, Ethereum’s role risks becoming commoditized.
This contrasts sharply with platforms like Solana, where execution, settlement, and value accrual happen more cohesively within a single architecture. The result? Better alignment between usage and economic return.
The User Experience Gap: Interoperability Pain Points
One of the most tangible reasons for capital flowing from Ethereum to alternatives is user experience, especially around cross-chain interoperability.
Transferring assets between Layer 2s or bridging to other chains often involves:
- High gas fees
- Long confirmation times
- Complex interfaces
- Risk of bridge exploits
These friction points frustrate users. When moving funds feels like navigating a maze, many opt for smoother alternatives — such as Solana — where transactions are fast, cheap, and reliable.
David Hoffman notes that user sentiment and investor confidence are deeply intertwined, possibly accounting for 80–90% of Ethereum’s price lag. Poor UX doesn’t just annoy users — it erodes trust in the entire ecosystem.
Can Ethereum Fix Interoperability?
Ethereum has proposed solutions like shared sequencers and cross-rollup messaging protocols. But Kyle remains skeptical. After nine years, the network still lacks a unified standard for Layer 2 communication. With so many independent teams building competing solutions, achieving consensus seems unlikely without centralized coordination.
He suggests that Vitalik Buterin should re-embrace his role as a "benevolent dictator" to push through an interoperability standard — not to undermine decentralization, but to prevent fragmentation from crippling usability.
ETH vs BTC: Functionality Over Store of Value
Ryan Sean Adams frames Bitcoin as a “special snowflake” — unique not because of technology, but because society collectively believes in its value as sound money.
Kyle agrees: Bitcoin’s simplicity and scarcity make it resilient. Even with poor UX, people hold it because of its predictable monetary policy and cultural legitimacy.
Ethereum, on the other hand, competes on functionality. It aims to be the foundation for a new financial system — more akin to a tech stock than digital gold.
But here lies a tension:
- Capital assets (like stocks) generate cash flow.
- Commodities are inputs for production.
- Store-of-value assets (like gold or BTC) preserve wealth.
Where does ETH fit?
Kyle argues that focusing solely on being a store of value misses the point. Instead, Ethereum should optimize for productive use cases — DeFi, NFTs, tokenized assets — where real economic activity generates returns.
Yet if Layer 2s capture most of that value, can ETH truly function as a capital asset?
The Solana Contrast: Efficiency Over Ideology
Solana’s builders take a different approach. As David observes, they’re commercially oriented, focused on solving user problems quickly rather than adhering strictly to decentralization ideals.
This doesn’t mean Solana ignores decentralization — but it prioritizes speed, cost-efficiency, and developer agility.
During crises like the FTX collapse, Solana’s validator count dropped and TVL plunged. Yet its consensus remained intact, proving that extreme decentralization isn’t always necessary for resilience.
Kyle emphasizes that bridges between traditional finance (TradFi) and crypto — even if centralized — play a vital role in adoption. Systems don’t need to be 100% decentralized to be useful; they need to work well for real users.
👉 Explore how next-gen blockchains are redefining speed, cost, and accessibility in crypto.
Strengths That Keep Ethereum Relevant
Despite these challenges, Kyle acknowledges Ethereum’s strengths:
Regulatory Clarity
Ethereum enjoys relatively favorable regulatory treatment in many jurisdictions. Its long history and transparent governance help position it as a legitimate financial infrastructure — a key advantage over newer chains.
Talent Concentration
The Ethereum ecosystem attracts some of the brightest minds in crypto. From core protocol developers to DeFi innovators, this density of human capital drives sustained innovation.
Ecosystem Influence
Ethereum sets standards others follow. From ERC-20 tokens to smart contract patterns, its design choices shape the entire industry. This leadership role gives it enduring influence beyond pure performance metrics.
Moving Forward: What Ethereum Needs to Change
To regain momentum, Kyle proposes three key shifts:
- Improve Communication Between Core Devs and App Builders
Top developers (e.g., from Aave) reportedly have no direct contact with Ethereum Foundation members. Closing this gap ensures real-world needs inform protocol upgrades. - Establish Clear Interoperability Standards
Without agreement on how Layer 2s interact, fragmentation will worsen. A top-down push for standardization may be necessary. - Prioritize User-Centric Design
If user feedback had been integrated earlier (e.g., in 2020), many current pain points might have been avoided. Building with users, not just for them, is essential.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Is Ethereum doomed because of Layer 2 fragmentation?
A: Not necessarily. Fragmentation is a challenge, but it also reflects growth and innovation. The key is whether Ethereum can unify these layers through standards — not eliminate them.
Q: Can Ethereum ever match Solana’s speed and low fees?
A: Direct comparison is misleading. Ethereum prioritizes security and decentralization; Solana optimizes for performance. However, with continued Layer 2 advancements like zk-Rollups, ETH can offer competitive UX without sacrificing core values.
Q: Why do people still invest in Ethereum if its value capture is weak?
A: Because it hosts the largest DeFi and NFT ecosystems. Network effects matter. Even with imperfect economics today, many believe future upgrades (e.g., full danksharding) will strengthen value accrual.
Q: Does better UX really affect token price?
A: Absolutely. User experience directly influences adoption, developer interest, and capital flows. As Kyle notes, sentiment drives markets — especially in crypto.
Q: Is decentralization overrated?
A: It depends on the use case. For censorship-resistant systems like Bitcoin or privacy tools, high decentralization is crucial. For scalable financial platforms, some trade-offs may be acceptable if they improve functionality.
Q: Could Solana overtake Ethereum?
A: It already has in certain metrics (e.g., daily active addresses). Whether it surpasses ETH in total ecosystem value depends on sustained innovation, security track record, and long-term developer retention.
The debate isn't about whether Ethereum is “good” or “bad.” It's about whether it can evolve fast enough to meet rising competition. While its fundamentals remain strong, user experience, interoperability, and value capture must improve — or risk losing relevance in a rapidly maturing crypto economy.
👉 Stay ahead of market trends with real-time data and insights from top blockchain networks.