In the rapidly evolving world of blockchain technology, transaction speed remains a key metric for evaluating performance. According to a recent report by CoinGecko, Solana has emerged as the undisputed leader in real-world transaction throughput, achieving a peak of 1,504 transactions per second (TPS) on April 6, 2024. This record-breaking figure positions Solana well ahead of its competitors, showcasing its capacity to handle high-volume network activity efficiently.
👉 Discover how high-speed blockchains are reshaping decentralized applications today.
Solana’s Speed vs. Theoretical Limits
While Solana’s official whitepaper claims a theoretical maximum of 64,000 TPS, the recorded peak of 1,504 TPS represents just 1.6% of that potential. Despite falling short of its upper limit, this real-world performance still outpaces most other major blockchains by a significant margin.
To put this into perspective:
- Solana is 46 times faster than Ethereum.
- It’s five times faster than Polygon.
- And it leads Sui — the second-fastest blockchain — by nearly double.
This level of throughput demonstrates Solana’s robust architecture, which combines Proof of History (PoH) with a modified Proof of Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism to enable rapid transaction finality and low latency.
Sui Secures Second Place in TPS Rankings
Coming in second is Sui, a newer entrant in the smart contract blockchain space, which achieved a peak of 854 TPS during the study period. Built on the Move programming language and designed for scalability from the ground up, Sui leverages parallel transaction execution to maximize efficiency.
Other notable performers in the top tier include:
- TON (The Open Network)
- Tron
- NEAR Protocol
- Avalanche
These platforms have demonstrated strong real-world performance, reflecting growing demand for fast, cost-effective blockchains capable of supporting large-scale decentralized applications (dApps), gaming ecosystems, and Web3 services.
Lower Throughput for Established Chains
In contrast, more established but slower blockchains like Bitcoin and ThorChain ranked near the bottom of the list:
- Bitcoin: 10.7 TPS
- ThorChain: 2.1 TPS
These figures highlight a fundamental trade-off in blockchain design: while older networks prioritize security and decentralization, they often sacrifice speed and scalability. For use cases requiring high-frequency transactions — such as payments, DeFi trading, or NFT minting — these limitations can hinder user experience and adoption.
Methodology Behind the TPS Analysis
CoinGecko’s assessment focused on real-world transaction data, not theoretical benchmarks. The research team analyzed the top 30 blockchains by Total Value Locked (TVL) as listed on DefiLlama on May 15, 2024. Daily average TPS was calculated using data pulled from blockchain explorers and Dune Analytics, ensuring consistency across different networks.
This approach provides a more accurate picture of actual network performance under real usage conditions, avoiding inflated claims often seen in marketing materials.
👉 See how leading blockchains compare in real-time transaction processing.
Why Some Blockchains Were Excluded
Notably, several prominent chains were excluded from the study due to insufficient public data:
- Cardano
- PulseChain
- Kava
- Hyperliquid
- Rootstock
Without reliable access to on-chain metrics or transparent explorer data, CoinGecko could not calculate accurate TPS values for these networks. This underscores an ongoing challenge in the blockchain analytics space: data availability and standardization.
Is TPS Still Relevant?
While transaction speed is often highlighted as a key performance indicator, experts continue to debate its true significance.
The Case for High TPS
Supporters argue that high TPS is essential for:
- Scaling global financial infrastructure
- Supporting mass-market dApps and games
- Reducing congestion and gas fees during peak demand
- Attracting enterprise adoption
High-speed blockchains like Solana and Sui are increasingly being used for real-time applications such as micropayments, social media platforms, and decentralized exchanges where latency directly impacts user satisfaction.
The Criticism: Speed at What Cost?
Critics caution that chasing high TPS can come at the expense of core blockchain principles:
- Decentralization: Some high-speed chains rely on fewer validators or centralized infrastructure.
- Security: Rapid consensus mechanisms may introduce new attack vectors.
- Censorship resistance: Faster networks might be more prone to regulatory pressure due to concentrated control.
As one crypto commentator noted on social media:
"Flexing TPS is like saying rice is the best food because you eat 10,000 grains per meal."
— pseudo (on Farcaster)
This analogy highlights the risk of overemphasizing one metric while ignoring broader system health.
Core Keywords Driving This Discussion
The key themes and core keywords that define this analysis include:
- blockchain speed
- transactions per second (TPS)
- Solana performance
- real-world TPS
- high-speed blockchain
- blockchain scalability
- decentralized network efficiency
- fastest blockchain 2025
These terms reflect both technical interest and market sentiment around what makes a blockchain truly effective beyond marketing hype.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: What is the fastest blockchain according to real-world data?
A: Based on CoinGecko’s report, Solana holds the title with a peak of 1,504 real TPS recorded on April 6, 2024.
Q: Why doesn’t Solana reach its claimed 64,000 TPS?
A: The 64,000 TPS figure is a theoretical maximum under ideal lab conditions. Real-world constraints like network latency, validator performance, and transaction complexity prevent reaching this ceiling.
Q: How does Sui achieve high transaction speeds?
A: Sui uses parallel execution via its object-centric data model and the Move programming language, allowing multiple transactions to be processed simultaneously without conflict.
Q: Is high TPS always better for a blockchain?
A: Not necessarily. While speed improves user experience, it must be balanced with decentralization, security, and long-term sustainability to maintain trust and resilience.
Q: Why were Cardano and PulseChain left out of the study?
A: CoinGecko excluded them due to insufficient publicly available transaction data needed to calculate accurate daily average TPS.
Q: Can Ethereum compete with Solana in terms of speed?
A: Currently, Ethereum lags behind Solana in raw TPS. However, with ongoing upgrades like Proto-Danksharding and Layer 2 rollups, Ethereum aims to improve scalability without compromising decentralization.
👉 Explore how next-gen blockchains are pushing the limits of speed and scalability.
Final Thoughts: Speed Matters — But So Does Balance
The CoinGecko report reaffirms that Solana leads the pack in real-world transaction speed — a critical advantage in today’s competitive Web3 landscape. Yet, as the debate around TPS continues, it’s clear that no single metric tells the whole story.
True innovation lies in achieving a balance between speed, security, decentralization, and developer accessibility. As user expectations grow and new use cases emerge — from AI-integrated dApps to real-world asset tokenization — blockchains will need to evolve beyond raw performance numbers to deliver sustainable value.
For investors, developers, and users alike, understanding both the strengths and limitations of high-speed networks is essential for making informed decisions in an increasingly complex ecosystem.