The Merge marked a pivotal shift in Ethereum’s evolution, transitioning the network from energy-intensive Proof-of-Work (PoW) to a more sustainable and economically sound Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism on September 15, 2022. This upgrade didn’t just reduce environmental impact—it fundamentally reshaped Ethereum’s tokenomics and catalyzed the growth of a robust staking ecosystem, particularly within the Liquid Staking Derivatives (LSD) sector.
With ETH issuance slashed and transaction fees now flowing directly to validators, long-term holders have stronger incentives than ever to participate in securing the network. As a result, the post-Merge landscape has seen exponential growth in staked ETH, with increasing demand for accessible, secure, and decentralized staking solutions.
This article dives deep into the mechanics of Ethereum’s PoS economy, explores key players in node infrastructure and staking services, and analyzes how innovations like liquid staking are driving decentralization and user empowerment.
Understanding The Merge: From PoW to PoS
The Merge was not a simple upgrade—it was a complete architectural transformation. Prior to 2022, Ethereum operated under PoW, where miners competed to solve complex cryptographic puzzles, consuming vast amounts of electricity in the process. After The Merge, validation is now performed by stakers who lock up ETH as collateral to verify transactions and propose blocks.
This transition brought two major benefits:
- Energy Efficiency: Ethereum’s energy consumption dropped by an estimated 99.98%, making it one of the most environmentally sustainable blockchains.
- Economic Alignment: Validators are now rewarded directly from transaction fees and protocol-issued rewards, aligning their incentives with network security.
Post-Merge, Ethereum operates across two layers:
- Execution Layer: Handles transaction processing and state changes via the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM).
- Consensus Layer: Manages validator coordination and finality through the Beacon Chain using PoS.
👉 Discover how staking is reshaping Ethereum’s economic future—start exploring today.
The Rise of Staking in Ethereum’s New Economy
With staking now central to Ethereum’s operation, over 30% of all ETH is actively staked—creating a powerful deflationary pressure when combined with EIP-1559’s burn mechanism. When more ETH is burned in fees than issued as rewards, the total supply contracts, potentially turning ETH into a deflationary asset.
Two core dynamics fuel this trend:
- Reduced Issuance: New ETH issuance per block fell dramatically post-Merge.
- Increased Staking Yield: Validators earn both base protocol rewards and priority fees (tips), enhancing return potential.
As more users stake, less ETH circulates in the open market—increasing scarcity and strengthening price support.
Key Participants in the Proof-of-Stake Ecosystem
The PoS economy thrives on collaboration between various actors: individual stakers, node operators, infrastructure providers, and liquidity layer protocols. Let’s break down the core components.
What Is a Node?
A node is any device running Ethereum client software (e.g., Geth, Lighthouse). Nodes maintain the blockchain by storing data, validating blocks, and relaying information. There are three main types:
- Full Nodes: Store complete blockchain data and validate all transactions.
- Light Nodes: Request data from full nodes; ideal for mobile wallets due to low resource usage.
- Archive Nodes: Maintain historical state data—critical for analytics platforms and block explorers.
To become a validator, users must stake 32 ETH and run three components: an execution client, a consensus client, and a validator client. Validators propose and attest to blocks, earning rewards—or facing penalties—for honest participation.
Node Infrastructure: Centralized vs. Decentralized
Web3 developers need reliable access to blockchain data—typically via Remote Procedure Calls (RPCs). How they obtain this access shapes the network’s resilience and decentralization.
Running Your Own Node
Operating your own node offers full control and maximum security.
Pros:
- Full staking rewards
- No reliance on third parties
- Enhanced privacy and censorship resistance
Challenges:
- Requires technical expertise
- 32 ETH minimum stake
- Ongoing maintenance and uptime demands
While ideal for advanced users, most retail investors seek easier alternatives.
Using Centralized Providers (e.g., Infura, Alchemy)
Services like Infura and Alchemy provide easy API access to Ethereum data—widely used by dApps and wallets.
Advantages:
- Fast setup
- High reliability
- Cost-effective for small projects
Risks:
- Single point of failure: Over 65% of Ethereum nodes rely on AWS, Google Cloud, or Azure.
- Censorship risk: As seen with Tornado Cash sanctions, centralized providers may comply with government orders.
- Centralization threat: Heavy reliance undermines Web3’s core principle of decentralization.
“Not your keys, not your crypto” applies not just to wallets—but to infrastructure too.
👉 Access decentralized tools that empower true ownership—explore your options now.
Embracing Decentralized Infrastructure (e.g., Pocket Network, Ankr)
Decentralized networks distribute RPC requests across thousands of independent nodes.
Benefits:
- No single point of failure
- Greater censorship resistance
- Geographic diversity improves performance
Trade-offs:
- Lower throughput compared to centralized systems
- Higher coordination costs
Despite scalability challenges, decentralized infrastructure is vital for preserving Ethereum’s long-term integrity.
Staking-as-a-Service: Lowering Barriers to Participation
Not everyone can afford 32 ETH or manage complex node operations. Enter Staking-as-a-Service (SaaS) providers—platforms that handle technical complexity while enabling broader participation.
There are three primary models:
- Liquid Staking Platforms
- Centralized Exchange Staking
- Staking Pools
Liquid Staking: Unlocking Liquidity Without Sacrificing Rewards
Liquid staking allows users to stake ETH and receive a tokenized representation (a derivative) that remains tradable or usable in DeFi.
For example:
- Deposit ETH into Lido → receive stETH
- Deposit into Rocket Pool → receive rETH
- Deposit into Swell → receive swETH
These tokens accrue value as staking rewards compound, enabling users to:
- Earn yield in DeFi protocols
- Trade or collateralize their position
- Avoid long withdrawal lockups
According to Dune Analytics, liquid staking controls over 33% of all staked ETH, with Lido dominating the market.
Why Liquid Staking Matters:
- Eliminates opportunity cost
- Reduces centralization risk via diversified validator sets
- Enables composability in DeFi ecosystems
Leading Liquid Staking Protocols Compared
Lido: Market Leader with Centralization Concerns
Lido holds ~30% of all staked ETH. It uses a curated list of node operators meeting strict criteria:
- No single operator controls >1% of validators
- Geographic and client diversity enforced
- On-chain performance tracking via DAO governance
However, critics argue Lido remains too centralized due to its permissioned operator model.
To address this, Lido is adopting:
- Distributed Validator Technology (DVT): Spreads validation duties across multiple nodes.
- Node Operator Scoring System: Enables performance-based delegation.
Revenue comes from a 10% cut of staking rewards—split between node operators (5%) and treasury (5%).
Rocket Pool: Decentralization Through Innovation
Rocket Pool lowers the entry barrier by allowing "minipools" where node operators contribute only 16 ETH, matched with 16 ETH from the protocol.
Key features:
- Minimum stake: 0.01 ETH for regular users
- Governance token (RPL) used as security bond
- Operators earn RPL rewards + commissions
Rocket Pool promotes decentralization by enabling smaller players to run validators—currently holding ~3.2% market share.
Swell Network: Permissionless & NFT-Powered Staking
Swell introduces unique innovations:
- Atomic deposits: Users stake directly with chosen operators (minimum 1 ETH)
- swNFT + swETH: NFTs store staking metadata; swETH acts as a receipt token
- SSV Integration: Uses Shared Secret Validators (DVT) to reduce hardware requirements per node
Swell also runs yield-generating vaults similar to Yearn Finance—adding another income layer.
Centralized Exchange Staking (e.g., Binance, Coinbase, OKX)
Exchanges offer simple staking interfaces with competitive APRs—but come with trade-offs:
- Assets remain under custodial control
- No liquid derivatives (except Binance’s bETH)
- Longer lock-up periods
- Loss of voting rights in network upgrades
While convenient, custodial staking contradicts self-sovereignty principles—highlighted by events like the FTX collapse.
Staking Pools: Collective Validation Power
Staking pools aggregate capital from multiple users to meet the 32 ETH requirement. They function similarly to mining pools in PoW networks.
Types:
- Public pools (open participation)
- Private pools (invite-only)
Admins manage node operations; participants earn proportional rewards.
Pros:
- Low entry threshold
- Minimal technical knowledge required
Cons:
- Often lack transparency (off-chain accounting)
- Centralized control over funds
Cold staking variants allow users to keep assets in personal wallets—improving security.
Industry Trend: The Shift Toward Permissionless Participation
The future of Ethereum staking lies in permissionless, non-custodial, and decentralized models. Projects like Swell, Rocket Pool, and emerging DVT-based protocols are pushing toward a more inclusive ecosystem where anyone can participate without gatekeepers.
As concerns grow over reliance on centralized cloud providers and concentrated validator power, the community continues pushing for:
- Greater client diversity
- Geographic distribution of nodes
- Transparent governance mechanisms
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: What is liquid staking?
A: Liquid staking lets you earn staking rewards while maintaining liquidity through derivative tokens like stETH or rETH—usable across DeFi platforms.
Q: Is staking safe after The Merge?
A: Yes—with caveats. Running your own validator carries slashing risks if misconfigured. Using reputable liquid staking protocols mitigates technical risks but introduces smart contract risk.
Q: Can I unstake my ETH anytime?
A: Yes—since the Shanghai upgrade in 2023, withdrawals are fully enabled. However, exchange-based staking may still impose delays.
Q: Which is better: Lido or Rocket Pool?
A: Lido offers simplicity and high adoption; Rocket Pool provides greater decentralization. Your choice depends on priorities—convenience vs. sovereignty.
Q: Does staking make ETH deflationary?
A: Potentially. When transaction fee burns exceed new issuance, net supply decreases—especially during high network activity.
Q: How much can I earn from staking?
A: Annual yields typically range from 3% to 5%, depending on network conditions and protocol fees.
👉 Start earning yield on your crypto—secure your spot in the new staking economy today.