Japan has long been recognized as a forward-thinking jurisdiction in the world of digital assets. With its progressive yet structured approach, the country has emerged as a prime destination for companies seeking to establish a foothold in the cryptocurrency sector. However, with opportunity comes responsibility—and regulation.
The Japanese government has continuously refined its regulatory framework to ensure investor protection, market stability, and innovation. A pivotal moment in this evolution came with the 2019 amendments to the Payment Services Act (PSA) and the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA). These changes, which took effect on June 7, 2020, reshaped the landscape for crypto exchanges, initial coin offerings (ICOs), brokerage services, and asset custody.
Understanding these updated rules is essential for any business planning to operate in Japan’s crypto space. Let’s explore what these regulations mean, why they were introduced, and how they affect different aspects of cryptocurrency operations.
Why Were the 2019 Regulatory Changes Necessary?
The push for stronger regulation followed a major security breach in January 2018, when a prominent Japanese cryptocurrency exchange was hacked, resulting in the loss of a significant amount of customer-held digital assets. This incident exposed critical weaknesses in the internal governance and operational systems of several registered exchanges.
In response, the Japan Financial Services Agency (JFSA) launched investigations and identified systemic risks, including:
- High volatility in cryptocurrency prices leading to speculative trading
- Potential for fraud in ICOs
- Lack of investor safeguards
- Gaps in oversight of decentralized technologies
These concerns highlighted the need to treat certain digital assets as financial instruments rather than mere payment tools. The JFSA established a dedicated study group in March 2018, which by December had issued recommendations that laid the foundation for the 2019 amendments.
👉 Discover how global crypto regulations are shaping secure investment opportunities.
Key Changes Under the 2019 Amendments
1. Classification of Cryptocurrencies as Financial Instruments
One of the most significant updates was the inclusion of "crypto assets" (ango shisan) in the definition of financial instruments under the FIEA. This means that:
- Crypto derivatives are now regulated under Japan’s derivatives laws
- Trading platforms must comply with stricter disclosure and operational requirements
- Certain blockchain-based tokens are classified as Type II Financial Instruments, particularly those tied to collective investment schemes
This shift aligns Japan with international standards set by bodies like the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and enhances transparency across the market.
2. Licensing Requirements for Exchanges and Brokers
To operate legally in Japan, crypto exchanges and brokerage firms must obtain proper authorization from the JFSA. Key requirements include:
- Robust IT infrastructure and cybersecurity measures
- Sufficient human resources and compliance personnel
- Clear risk management policies, especially for retail investors
- Mandatory registration under both PSA and FIEA frameworks
Additionally, firms engaging in margin trading involving crypto assets must adhere to new minimum margin rules designed to curb excessive speculation.
3. Regulation of ICOs: From Innovation to Compliance
Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) are no longer unregulated territory in Japan. Under the revised FIEA:
- Tokens structured as investment contracts or linked to profit-sharing mechanisms fall under securities law
- A new category called "Electronic Rights Transfer Records" (denshi kiroku iten kenri) was introduced to classify tokenized securities
- Issuers conducting ICOs through a self-solicitation model (jiko boshu) within a collective investment scheme must register as Type II Financial Instruments Business Operators
This ensures that investors receive proper disclosures and that fundraising activities meet due diligence standards—similar to traditional securities offerings.
Crypto Asset Custody: Who Can Hold Your Tokens?
Another critical update involves custody services. Previously, holding crypto on behalf of clients existed in a gray area. Now:
- Any entity managing electronic transfer records for client trading purposes is considered to be conducting trust business (yuka shoken tou kanri gyomu)
- Such operators must register under FIEA as either Type I or Type II financial instrument providers
- Custodians of crypto assets must also be registered crypto asset exchange operators under the PSA
This dual-registration requirement strengthens accountability and reduces the risk of mismanagement or theft.
Investor Protection and Market Integrity
Beyond licensing and classification, the reforms emphasize retail investor protection:
- Exchanges must provide clear, standardized risk disclosures
- Marketing materials are subject to review to prevent misleading claims
- Speculative practices like unlimited leverage are restricted
- Unfair trading behaviors—including insider trading and market manipulation—are explicitly prohibited under a new chapter added to FIEA
These measures aim to build trust in digital asset markets while encouraging responsible innovation.
Transition Period and Compliance Deadlines
The 2019 amendments came into force on June 7, 2020, with a six-month transition period for market participants. Existing crypto businesses were given 18 months to fully comply with registration requirements.
Failure to meet these deadlines results in loss of operating rights. New entrants must complete the full licensing process before launching services—a rigorous but necessary step toward a safer ecosystem.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Do all cryptocurrencies qualify as securities under Japanese law?
A: No. Only tokens that represent investment rights—such as profit-sharing or participation in collective schemes—are treated as Type II financial instruments. Utility tokens may still fall outside securities regulation.
Q: Can foreign companies operate crypto exchanges in Japan without local registration?
A: No. Any firm serving Japanese residents must register with the JFSA and establish a compliant local presence.
Q: What is the difference between Type I and Type II financial instrument registrations?
A: Type I covers brokerage, trading, and underwriting activities. Type II applies specifically to investment management and advisory services related to collective investment schemes—commonly used for ICOs.
Q: Are stablecoins regulated differently in Japan?
A: Yes. Stablecoins pegged to fiat currencies may be classified as "crypto assets" under PSA or even as e-money depending on their structure and use case.
Q: How long does it take to get licensed in Japan?
A: The process typically takes 6–12 months due to strict audits, system checks, and documentation reviews by the JFSA.
👉 Learn how compliant platforms are setting new standards in crypto security and access.
The Bigger Picture: Japan’s Vision for Crypto
Japan’s regulatory approach strikes a balance between fostering innovation and ensuring financial stability. By integrating crypto assets into its existing legal framework, the country positions itself as a leader in responsible digital finance.
For entrepreneurs and investors, this means clearer pathways—but also higher entry barriers. Success requires not just technical expertise but deep compliance knowledge.
As global regulators watch Japan’s model closely, its experience could influence future policies worldwide. Whether you're launching an ICO, starting an exchange, or offering custody solutions, understanding Japan’s rules isn't optional—it's essential.
👉 Stay ahead of regulatory trends and explore compliant ways to grow your digital asset strategy.
Final Thoughts
Japan’s 2019 cryptocurrency regulatory overhaul marked a turning point in how digital assets are governed. With clearer classifications, stronger licensing requirements, and enhanced investor protections, the country has built a framework that supports innovation within safe boundaries.
For businesses eyeing Japan’s market, thorough preparation is key. Engaging legal experts familiar with FIEA and PSA compliance can make the difference between success and shutdown.
As blockchain technology evolves, so too will regulation. Staying informed—and adaptable—is the best way to thrive in one of Asia’s most dynamic crypto economies.