Korean Central Bank Deputy Governor: Stablecoin Issuance Should Start with Banks and Gradually Expand

·

The digital asset landscape in South Korea is undergoing rapid transformation, driven by surging transaction volumes and evolving regulatory perspectives. At the heart of this shift is a growing consensus among policymakers that stablecoins—digital currencies pegged to stable assets like the U.S. dollar—should be introduced cautiously, beginning with tightly regulated financial institutions.

According to Deputy Governor Ryu Sang-im of the Bank of Korea (BOK), the country’s approach to stablecoin issuance should follow a phased model: starting with banks under strict supervision before expanding to non-banking entities. This measured strategy aims to balance innovation with financial stability, consumer protection, and national monetary sovereignty.

A Phased Approach to Stablecoin Regulation

Speaking at a meeting with major commercial bank executives held at the BOK headquarters in Seoul, Deputy Governor Ryu emphasized the importance of regulatory prudence.

“Initially, it would be better to allow stablecoin issuance primarily through banks, which are subject to higher levels of financial oversight, and then gradually extend it to non-bank sectors,” Ryu stated on Tuesday.

This tiered rollout reflects growing concerns over the risks associated with decentralized finance and unregulated digital currency issuance. By anchoring the first wave of stablecoin activity within the traditional banking system, regulators can ensure stronger compliance with anti-money laundering (AML) standards, capital requirements, and consumer safeguards.

👉 Discover how financial institutions are preparing for the next era of digital money.

Rising Digital Asset Activity in South Korea

South Korea has emerged as one of Asia's most active crypto markets. Data shows that digital asset transaction volume surged from $12.9 billion (17.59 trillion KRW) in Q3 2024 to **$42.4 billion (57.9 trillion KRW)** in Q1 2025—an increase of over 227% in just six months.

This explosive growth has been fueled by several factors:

Notably, nearly half—$19.5 billion—of all digital assets transferred overseas during Q1 2025 were sent in the form of stablecoins. This trend has sparked debate about potential capital flight and its implications for the Korean won and domestic monetary policy.

Safeguarding Monetary Sovereignty and Consumer Interests

The rise of cross-border stablecoin usage underscores a critical challenge: maintaining control over national monetary systems while embracing financial innovation.

Deputy Governor Ryu highlighted that the central bank’s primary objective is to build a resilient regulatory framework capable of preventing market disruptions and protecting users.

“Our goal is to establish a safety net, taking into account the risks of market volatility and potential harm to consumers,” Ryu explained.

Without proper oversight, widespread use of privately issued stablecoins could undermine confidence in the national currency, complicate monetary policy transmission, and expose users to fraud or insolvency risks—especially if issuers lack sufficient reserves.

To mitigate these threats, the BOK is exploring a hybrid model where:

This framework aligns with global trends, including initiatives by the U.S. Federal Reserve, European Central Bank, and Financial Stability Board to bring stablecoins under formal supervision.

👉 Learn what’s driving the future of regulated digital currency ecosystems.

Why Banks Should Lead Stablecoin Innovation

There are compelling reasons why banks are seen as the ideal starting point for stablecoin deployment:

1. Established Trust and Oversight

Banks operate under rigorous capital adequacy rules, regular audits, and deposit insurance frameworks—qualities essential for maintaining confidence in any currency-like instrument.

2. Existing Infrastructure

Financial institutions already possess secure payment networks, KYC/AML systems, and customer verification protocols that can be adapted for stablecoin operations.

3. Regulatory Accountability

Unlike decentralized platforms or fintech startups, banks are directly accountable to central authorities, making enforcement and intervention more effective during crises.

4. Smooth Integration with Traditional Finance

Bank-issued stablecoins can bridge conventional banking services with emerging blockchain applications, enabling seamless transfers between fiat and digital forms of value.

Future Outlook: From Pilot Programs to National Framework

While no official timeline has been announced, industry experts anticipate that pilot programs involving select banks could launch by late 2025. These trials would test technical feasibility, settlement efficiency, and regulatory compliance under real-world conditions.

Long-term, South Korea may develop a national stablecoin framework that includes:

Such a structure would position South Korea as a leader in responsible digital finance innovation—one that embraces technological progress without compromising stability.

👉 Explore how next-generation financial systems are being built today.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Why should stablecoins be issued by banks instead of private companies?

A: Banks are subject to stronger regulatory oversight, capital requirements, and consumer protection laws. This reduces the risk of fraud, insolvency, and systemic instability compared to unregulated private issuers.

Q: Could bank-issued stablecoins replace the Korean won?

A: No. These digital tokens are intended to complement—not replace—the national currency. They will function primarily as efficient tools for payments, remittances, and cross-border transactions.

Q: How will consumer funds be protected?

A: Regulators plan to require full backing of stablecoins with high-quality liquid assets (like cash or short-term government bonds), along with regular third-party audits to verify reserves.

Q: Will individuals be able to hold bank-issued stablecoins directly?

A: Likely yes—similar to holding digital wallets or mobile banking accounts. Access would require identity verification and adherence to AML regulations.

Q: What happens if a bank fails while holding stablecoin reserves?

A: Reserve assets would be segregated from the bank’s balance sheet, ensuring they remain available for redemption even in insolvency scenarios.

Q: How does this affect cryptocurrency exchanges and fintech firms?

A: Non-bank entities may eventually participate but only after robust regulatory frameworks are in place. For now, the focus remains on building a secure foundation through trusted institutions.


Core Keywords: stablecoin issuance, Bank of Korea, digital asset regulation, bank-led stablecoins, financial innovation, monetary sovereignty, consumer protection, decentralized finance