In a landmark development for the digital asset landscape in China, a recent court ruling has clarified that cryptocurrency is legally viewed as a virtual commodity and that personal ownership of such assets does not constitute an illegal act. While this decision has sparked speculation about a potential easing of China’s strict crypto ban, the reality remains nuanced. The judgment, issued by the Shanghai Songjiang District People’s Court, marks a significant shift in legal interpretation — but not necessarily in national policy.
This article explores the implications of the ruling, unpacks China’s complex stance on blockchain and digital assets, and examines whether this signal points to a broader regulatory evolution in the world’s second-largest economy.
Cryptocurrency as a Virtual Commodity: What the Ruling Means
The case centered around a service contract dispute related to cryptocurrency issuance and financing. While the court ruled that token-based fundraising activities without approval are illegal — aligning with existing regulations — it made a critical distinction: individuals holding cryptocurrency are not breaking the law.
Judge Sun Jie emphasized that although China prohibits the use of cryptocurrencies as payment instruments and bans related financial activities like trading and mining, the assets themselves retain value and are recognized as virtual property under civil law. This classification affirms that digital tokens like Bitcoin possess attributes of a tradable commodity, even if their commercial use is restricted.
👉 Discover how global markets are adapting to digital asset regulations.
This nuanced stance suggests that while speculative and financial applications remain tightly controlled, personal possession falls into a legally protected gray area. For long-time holders in China, this offers a measure of reassurance amid years of uncertainty.
The Contradiction: Banning Crypto While Promoting Blockchain
China’s approach to digital assets has long appeared contradictory. On one hand, authorities have cracked down hard on crypto trading platforms, ICOs (Initial Coin Offerings), and mining operations since 2017 — culminating in a near-total ban by 2021. On the other hand, the government has consistently championed blockchain technology as a strategic priority.
Official statements have labeled blockchain a “core technology” for future innovation, with applications envisioned across supply chain management, finance, healthcare, and public services. The state-backed Blockchain-based Service Network (BSN) is one example of China’s push to build infrastructure for enterprise-grade distributed ledger systems.
Yet, removing cryptocurrency from blockchain ignores a fundamental truth: tokens incentivize network participation and secure decentralized systems. By supporting the technology while suppressing its native economic layer, China risks limiting the full potential of blockchain adoption.
Why This Ruling Could Signal Change
Although no formal policy reversal has occurred, several developments suggest that China may be re-evaluating its hardline stance:
- Judicial recognition of crypto as property strengthens legal foundations for future regulatory frameworks.
- Hong Kong’s progressive approach serves as a testing ground: the special administrative region now licenses crypto exchanges and allows retail trading, signaling possible mainland influence.
- Digital yuan development continues at pace, with pilot programs expanding nationwide. While centralized, the e-CNY project borrows concepts from decentralized architectures, indicating technical familiarity with crypto principles.
These moves reflect a growing awareness that digital assets are more than just speculative tools — they represent evolving financial infrastructure.
👉 See how digital assets are shaping the future of finance.
Global Trends Influencing China’s Position
Internationally, major economies are moving toward structured crypto regulation rather than outright bans. The U.S. treats Bitcoin and Ethereum as commodities, permitting futures trading and ETFs. The EU has enacted MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation), creating a harmonized framework for issuance and service providers.
Such progress contrasts sharply with China’s current isolation from global crypto markets. As institutional adoption grows abroad, there’s increasing pressure — both economic and technological — for China to reconsider its position to remain competitive in the digital economy.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Is it legal to own cryptocurrency in China?
Yes, according to recent judicial interpretations, personal holding of cryptocurrency is not illegal. However, trading on domestic platforms, mining, and using crypto as payment remain prohibited.
Can I buy Bitcoin in China?
Direct purchases through Chinese exchanges are banned. While peer-to-peer transactions may occur, they carry legal and financial risks due to lack of regulatory protection.
What is the difference between blockchain and cryptocurrency in China’s policy?
The government supports blockchain technology for industrial applications but restricts cryptocurrency due to concerns over financial stability, capital outflows, and illicit use.
Could China lift its crypto ban in the future?
A full reversal is unlikely soon, but gradual liberalization, especially in areas like cross-border trade or asset tokenization under strict oversight, is possible.
Is Hong Kong part of China’s crypto ban?
No. Hong Kong operates under a separate regulatory regime and now permits licensed crypto exchanges and retail trading, acting as a potential bridge between mainland policy and global standards.
How does the digital yuan relate to cryptocurrency?
The e-CNY (digital yuan) is a central bank digital currency (CBDC), fully controlled by the People’s Bank of China. Unlike decentralized cryptocurrencies, it does not support anonymity or open issuance but integrates some technical features inspired by blockchain.
The Path Forward: Regulation Over Prohibition?
The court’s acknowledgment of crypto as a form of property could lay the groundwork for future regulation rather than prohibition. If China chooses to develop a controlled framework — perhaps allowing limited investment products or enterprise tokenization under supervision — it could harness innovation while mitigating risks.
Such a model would align with its broader strategy of technological sovereignty: maintaining control over financial systems while adopting cutting-edge tools.
👉 Explore secure ways to engage with digital assets in compliant markets.
Conclusion: A Step Toward Evolution
While China is unlikely to lift its crypto restrictions overnight, the Shanghai court ruling represents more than just a legal clarification — it's a signal of evolving thinking within the system. Combined with Hong Kong’s openness and ongoing digital currency experiments, these developments suggest that China may be preparing for a more sophisticated engagement with digital assets.
As blockchain reshapes global finance and data infrastructure, the balance between innovation and control will define which nations lead the next digital era. For China, embracing regulated participation in the crypto ecosystem — even cautiously — could unlock significant economic and technological advantages.
The journey may be gradual, but the direction appears to be shifting.